Then, on the morning of July 10, I woke up and began the search again. Prince Harry reveals his one regret about London life. In a statement released by Harry and Markle, the couple said they were "fortunate to have enjoyed this special moment with family and Archie's godparents.". I wish I could provide you with an explanation from Chris Allerton. They feel so fortunate to have enjoyed this special moment with family and Archie’s godparents.”. 1 … In accordance with Royal tradition, The Lily Font and water from the River Jordan were used during the christening, which was officiated by the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Reverend Justin Welby. One of the photos shows the young tot’s grandfather Prince Charles and his wife Camilla attending. The image shows the castle's Rose Garden in the background. The … Just a few quick thoughts on the photos from today's baptism of Archie Harrison. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Or perhaps something happened during the workflow processing — but that, too, suggests the photos existed when the clock, in the processing equipment (computer), was set to May 8, 2019. Find out everything you need to know about Archie Harrison's christening. In short, I don’t know where speculation may come from (I have not seen any) but I can confirm without reservation. 5 Crazy Conspiracies Surrounding Archie Harrison’s Christening Photo. When her Majesty is off the clock, there if very little, if any, information ever given about what she gets up to in her free time. Copy link. Specifically, the brass ring, in which the minutes are notched, has been entirely painted over in the section falling between the ‘VIII’ and ‘X’. After perusing some photography websites, I found a handy EXIF data viewer, online, that conveniently states that outright. Archie, who was born in May, wore the handmade replica of the royal christening robe, made by the Queen's dressmaker Angela Kelly, during the ceremony. He holds his head up well, a bit like a 3 or 4 month old would. Highlighting two of the best examples is enough, for me, to conclude that they have, indeed, been ‘photoshopped.’. Below is one section, as a visual aid: And Harry’s hair appears to have been worked to *blend* better throughout the areas where it falls in front of the white sky behind it. Last modified on Jul 06, 2019 19:52 BST Jenni McKnight. Photo: Chris Allerton/Sussex Royal. While we do edit some of the metadata associated with the photo (for example, the alt-text for SEO purposes), otherwise photos are embedded directly as they are downloaded from the agency per our license. Palace yet to comment on Harry and Meghan’s explosive interview, Whitty says situation could ‘turn bad’ if lockdown easing is rushed, Thomas Markle says he was ‘disappointed’ with Oprah interview, Harry and Meghan interview: How the UK papers reacted. It was published sometime in the wee hours of the morning, on July 9, at a Romanian news website: I felt a bit deflated when I viewed the EXIF data and, lo and behold, it bore the EXACT same DateTimeOriginal as the color *family* photo…down to the second:  2019-05-08T22:56:06. Since Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry are so wildly popular, there’s bound to be intense scrutiny with every move they make. Without having an official explanation from Chris Allerton, the only conclusion I can reach is that the color group/family christening photo was inadvertently released with the EXIF data showing it had been taken on May 8, 2019, at 10:56 p.m. The official photos have been released, and they are adorable. One image released was a family photo inside Windsor Castle's Green Drawing Room, which shows the Duke and Duchess of Sussex sitting with their child alongside the Duchess of Cornwall and the Duchess of Cambridge. There was a flurry of activity on social media today after Prince Harry and Meghan finally gave the world their first proper glimpse of baby Archie. It indicates the time the photo WAS TAKEN. With all the bellyaching about ‘Fake News’, derision for a skeptical public, and the smearing of anyone who questions official/mainstream news sources as ‘conspiracy theorists’, one would think Allerton would have made an effort to help enlighten the public with what he knows. The Duchess of Sussex was wearing Dior. Finally, Archie's christening portraits were taken in a different location, not previously featured in any of the Cambridge children's photos. Eagle-eyed royal fans have spotted a hidden clue in Archie’s christening photos which could reveal what time the two-month-old was baptised Lucy Devine 7 Jul 2019, 15:58 ***That said, EXIF data can be stripped out and even edited, and it’s important to keep that in mind as you read on.***. It’s not often we know what the Queen is doing on the weekend. This is a follow up to my various social media posts, on July 8, regarding the camera EXIF data I noticed embedded in the color *family* christening image. Royal baby Archie's christening 06:59. Multiple people reached out to me and said they, too, could not locate one with the camera EXIF data intact. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have released official photographs from their son Archie's christening. Moreover, the B&W photo had already been released on July 6th. As a graphic designer, in real life, I believe the mantel clock shows the most obvious signs of tampering, in the color photo (although there are arguably other indications). The Duke and Duchess of Sussex released two photos to mark Archie’s christening, which took place at Windsor Castle on Saturday. Archie was baptised wearing the handmade replica of the royal christening gown which has been worn by royal infants for the last 11 years. Chris Allerton (or his staff) may have edited the EXIF data — but there’s no good reason to do that. Members of the St George’s Chapel Choir performed at the ceremony. So I set out, again, to find the earliest version of the B&W christening photos with the camera’s EXIF data intact. D espite the privacy of the event, the first photos from royal baby Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor’s christening are already here.. Archie's christening on July 6 was a joyous occasion for the House of Windsor, and the public was treated to the first set of photos showing off Master Archie's entire face and … I know, because I emailed Meghan’s Mirror for a comment, and was given permission to share their response: All of our photos are purchased/obtained through licensed photography agencies. Today the new parents chose a black and white family photo to celebrate Archie's christening, sharing a photograph posing alongside baby Archie in Windsor Castle gardens. Editorial Director Buckingham Palace has released photos of Archie Mountbatten-Windsor's christening, featuring Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and other members of the royal family. Mr Allerton said: "I am honoured to take the official photographs at the christening of Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, and to once again, be part of such a special and joyous occasion for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex.". The images were taken by fashion photographer Chris Allerton and released on Saturday. Standing behind them are the Prince of Wales, Meghan's mother Doria Ragland, the Duke of Cambridge and the sisters of the late Diana, Princess of Wales, Lady Jane Fellowes and Lady Sarah McCorquodale. Archie wore the same christening gown that his cousins, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, did. If playback doesn't begin shortly, try restarting your device. It was so badly done that the surface was given a ‘ridge’/‘lip’ when, in actuality, it is flat with notched minutes: For whatever reason, that area of the clock was altered — there is not a doubt in my mind. Fewer than 25 people were invited to the intimate christening, including Archie's godparents, whose identities have not been revealed by the palace. The camera’s clock battery must have died and the date and time was *stuck* on 2019-05-08T22:56:06? Moreover, I obtained the highest resolution versions of both photos from Getty Images, directly, and ran them through a program called JPEGSnoop. Archie wore the same christening gown that his cousins, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, did. Duchess July 9, 2019 No Comments. Baby Archie was christened Saturday at Windsor Castle's private chapel. While the garment is relatively new, it's rooted in a … – Amanda Question: Could the Romanian website — who published their article THREE DAYS AFTER THE CHRISTENING and AFTER the DateTimeOriginal anomaly was already spreading on social media — have obtained a late-released version of the B&W photo with DateTimeOriginal EXIF data that had been edited to muddy the waters? Therefore, as of now, he has no comment…and we have no official explanation. Archie was surrounded by family for his christening on Saturday. A Royal Communications spokesperson said: "The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are overjoyed to share the happiness of this day, and would like to thank everyone around the world for their ongoing support. Follow Go Fake Yourself Meghan on WordPress.com, Meghan’s Mirror posted the image they acquired, The first version of the B&W christening photo to appear on the internet, a high resolution image of the Vulliamy mantel clock. Archie’s Christening Photos: When Were They Taken & How Much Editing Was Done? Who is and who isn’t a prince or princess in the British Royal Family? That data indicates the photo was taken on May 8, 2019, at 10:56:06 p.m., rather than July 6, 2019, at 11:54 a.m. *** To begin, I reached… A second, black and white photo, pictured just Archie, Meghan and Harry in the Rose Garden at the castle. So, moving on with what I’ve found on my own…. Prince Harry in front of the horses, apparently named George and Sir John, as he announces the birth, A framed notice of birth was placed outside Buckingham Palace, Royal fans celebrate outside Windsor Castle. The official christening photos of royal baby Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor are here, and they're ADORABLE. This photo, specifically, was obtained from the Press Association directly. - This baby looks older than 8 weeks. Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, age and christening date as Meghan Markle and Prince Harry share new photo 0. That does not explain it…because I ALSO noticed something else…. Getty Images While the garment is … Read more: Meghan Markle wore a white Dior dress and matching fascinator for baby Archie's christening In one historic photo, how Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was presented to the world at his christening. 0. And still others have suggested the EXIF tag, ‘Original Date/Time’, is a reflection of a firmware or software update on the camera — but that is not what the EXIF DateTimeOriginal data indicates. This begs the question of whether someone — other than myself — caught that the color group/family christening photo EXIF data had been left intact, very quickly, and to obfuscate its importance, the B&W christening photo *had* to be re-released to reflect the same date and time to ‘muddy the waters.’. The image was shot in the opulence of Windsor Castle's Green Drawing Room - If the baby does indeed have Meghan's and Harry's DNA, Doria's DNA is not particularly visible at this point. The christening is a religious ceremony marking the baby's entry into the Anglican communion. No. With regard to the B&W christening photo, there are areas within the netting of Meghan’s hat that are far darker than background against which she appears. Lady Jane Fellowes, 62, and Lady Sarah McCorquodale , 64, stood at the back of Archie's christening photo in a … Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex (aka Meghan Markle), released two images on their official Instagram account Saturday after their son's christening. Tiggy Legge-Bourke, Harry and William's nanny, was seen leaving the ceremony in a car at around 1pm, according to reports. 0. The color *family* photo was taken with a NIKON. Meghan’s Mirror. 0. Share. Please let me know if you have any further questions. the Instagram account of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, reads "It's a Boy !". Read our, Family photo: the Royals gathered inside Windsor Castle's Green Drawing Room (Chris Allerton via PA), Meghan and Harry held the christening in private (Chris Allerton via PA), The Duke and Duchess of Sussex Baby Announcement - In pictures, London Covid cases by borough revealed as infections continue to fall, Piers Morgan storms off GMB after co-host says Meghan ‘cut him off’, Hillary Clinton backs Meghan as pressure grows on Palace to respond, Grace Victory: YouTuber with Covid ‘awake and baby thriving’, ITV sees profits slump but cheers turnaround signs, ‘Sorry’ Harry Dunn suspect willing to complete community service. 0. I had no luck on July 9 and eventually gave up. After examining other photographs, taken by Chris Allerton, I can find no others that show unreasonable/anomalous original date/time stamps. Outside of that, the only other possible explanations are not so innocent. And I succeeded via the image search engine, TinEye. The original Royal Christening Robe, made of fine Honiton lace lined with white satin, was commissioned by Queen Victoria in 1841 and first worn by her eldest daughter. wo photographs from the christening of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's first child Archie have been released. And one would think the media and royal reporters would try to get the facts, too. But even that is a story worth reporting. Watch later. That chain of custody is small…it went from PA directly to Meghan’s Mirror. Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was baptised in front of close family and friends in ... were pictured in an official photograph taken at the christening. Shopping. To continue, in an effort to rule out or confirm that the date issue was merely an issue with the camera’s date/time settings, I tried to locate a version of the B&W christening photo to compare the EXIF data. The eight-week-old boy was christened by the Archbishop of … …the B&W photo was taken WITH A DIFFERENT CAMERA. It’s also been argued that sometime between when the original image was last modified — before Press Associated (PA) made it available for distribution — and when Meghan’s Mirror posted the image they acquired — which is roughly ONE HOUR — the EXIF data may have been edited by someone in the chain of custody. A television journalist (L) works as Royal wellwishers celebrate outside of near Windsor Castle in Windsor, Town crier Tony Appleton announces the birth of baby boy to Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan Duchess of Sussex, outside Windsor Castle, Britain's Prince Harry speaks after Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, gave birth to a baby boy, at Windsor Castle, Footmen Stephen Kelly and Sarah Thompson bring out the easel in the forecourt of Buckingham Palace in London to formally announce the birth of a baby boy to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Memorabilia is pictured as people celebrate outside Windsor Castle after Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex gave birth to a boy, A sign is placed outside the Prince Harry pub after the announcement of the birth of a baby boy to Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan Duchess of Sussex in Windsor, The BT Tower displays a message in celebration of the birth of Prince Harry, and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex's new baby boy, Iconic London landmark known as the London Eye is seen illuminated in red, white and blue to celebrate the birth of Harry and Meghan's baby boy. Lady Jane and Lady Sarah, along with Markle's mother, are the only family members who aren't royals to be featured in the photo. Fortunately, there is a high resolution image of the Vulliamy mantel clock amongst the online photos of the royal family collection for comparison. That data indicates the photo was taken on May 8, 2019, at 10:56:06 p.m., rather than July 6, 2019, at 11:54 a.m. To begin, I reached out to the photographer who took the christening photos, Chris Allerton, and received a response from his office that he was on location, but I was assured that my questions would be brought to his attention when he returned. T. wo photographs from the christening of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex 's first child Archie have been released. However, before the initial release, the B&W christening photo had been stripped of its original date/time stamp and overwritten to show a date of July 6, and the ambiguous time, 00:00:00. The Duchess of Cambridge was wearing Stella McCartney, I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. A first look at Baby Archie's official christening photographs. Television crews at work outside Windsor Castle following the news of the birth of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's new baby boy, People gather outside Buckingham Palace to take pictures on their mobile phones of the notice placed on an easel in the palace's forecourt in London to formally announce the birth of a baby boy to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry speaks after the Duchess of Sussex gave birth to a baby boy, The moment Prince Harry thanks the horses, People celebrate outside Windsor Castle after Britain's Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex gave birth to a boy. That release information was edited into the metadata. The Lily Font, commissioned by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert for the baptism of their first child Victoria, Princess Royal, in 1841, was used, as was water from the River Jordan. Meghan’s Mirror denies editing the camera EXIF data AND they did NOT obtain the image from someone else who had apparent motive to do so. MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry have shown off baby Archie as they celebrated his royal christening today. …unless Allerton or PA falls on their swords and *admits* they are responsible for editing the original camera EXIF data, in the color family/group photo, when there is absolutely no good reason for them to have done that. In this social climate where there is rampant distrust in the media, one would prefer to think he would be happy to help shed light on this issue. Thus far, the only *plausible* innocent explanations offered, from others, are that either the camera’s clock battery died on May 8, 2019, at 10:56:06 p.m. OR the date and time on the camera used was not set correctly. This was a re-released photo. We also indicate the source of photos in the post, stating “PA/Wire”, indicating that they come from the Press Association’s Wire Feed. A second shot in black-and-white shows Meghan dressed in white gazing into Harry's eyes, while cradling her son, full name Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor. Without pouring over every detail, in both the color and B&W christening photos, there are a few obvious signs that the images have been altered beyond EXIF data, metadata, resizing, and cropping. Tap to unmute. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, as well as the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, reportedly arrived at the ceremony at around 11am by car and helicopter respectively. Archie christening photo: Who are the two women at the back? It shows an original date of 2019:07:06, but the time stamp shows 00:00:00. And I noticed another interesting bit of information in the metadata of the image: the B&W photo indicated it was made available for release on July 7, not July 6 like the color photo. Archie christening LIVE: Kate Middleton and William arrive but don't bring kids The second shot is a black and white photo of the proud parents holding their son, taken in the castle's Rose Garden. Archie christening photos LIVE: First pictures of royal baby being baptised released from private celebration. See Archie's Christening Portrait Side-by-Side with Prince Harry's 1984 Ceremony. Christening takes place at Windsor Castle See Archie Harrison's Official Christening Photos With the Royal Family Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's first child was baptized in a private ceremony at Windsor Castle on Saturday. Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, who is two months old, was christened at Windsor Castle. This is a follow up to my various social media posts, on July 8, regarding the camera EXIF data I noticed embedded in the color *family* christening image. And, it still retains the original camera EXIF data. However, it is missing a reliable ‘Original Date/Time’ stamp. Quick thoughts on Archie's baptism photos. An Instagram star has poked fun at royal baby Archie Mountbatten-Windsor’s christening photo in one of his many hilarious posts.. Gary Janetti first found fame as Executive Producer of Will and Grace but has since gained a huge following for his eponymous Instagram … I’ve tried following up, since then, to no avail. Though baby Archie’s royal christening was held privately over the weekend at Windsor Castle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are releasing photos from … Needless to say, this muddied the waters. In the photo, taken by photographer Chris Allerton, Meghan is holding baby Archie … Info. The first version of the B&W christening photo to appear on the internet came from the NBC News website (Today), and was obtained from Getty Images. I can come up with no (other) way to explain why the color photo shows it originated on May 8, at 10:56 p.m. Muddying the waters is the only damage control *available*….

Spiegel Abo Prämie Wagenfeld Leuchte, Wenn Männer Sich Plötzlich Wieder Melden, Ina Paule Klink, Tipico Einzahlung Paypal, Ausmalbilder Tiger Für Erwachsene, Witziges übers älterwerden, Motorradanhänger Mieten Berlin, Grünes Gemüse Rätsel 11 Buchstaben, Fahrradbekleidung Damen Lidl,